Si Arkanghel Miguel ba ang ating Panginoong HesuKristo?

Frostwhite wrote:

Basahin mo. Masahol pa sa pagsaway, ha? Ibig sabihin, todo-todo na ang pagmumura ni Miguel Arkanghel kay satanas?

Kailangan bang magmura pag sumusuway? Hehe.
Paano nga Ginoo kung mas masahol pa sa pagsuway ang ginawa ni Miguel?

Frostwhite wrote:

Oh my goodness, wala ba sa talata yon?

Nakita ko nga po. Pero ang tanong ko ay ganito.

Ang ibig nyo po bang sabihin e nanganak ang Diyos? May matres ganon po ba? Pwede po bang pakilinaw?
Ang tanong e, kelan po ba nanganak ang Diyos ayon sa talata? Nagtatanong lang po

.

Frostwhite wrote:So ibig nyo pong sabihin mali po lahat ng salin na mga ito? Ganon po ba?

New International Version (1984)
But he was rebuked for his wrongdoing by a donkey--a beast without speech--who spoke with a man's voice and restrained the prophet's madness.
New Living Translation (2007)
But Balaam was stopped from his mad course when his donkey rebuked him with a human voice.

English Standard Version (2001)
but was rebuked for his own transgression; a speechless donkey spoke with human voice and restrained the prophet’s madness.

New American Standard Bible (1995)
but he received a rebuke for his own transgression, for a mute donkey, speaking with a voice of a man, restrained the madness of the prophet.

King James Bible (Cambridge Ed.)
But was rebuked for his iniquity: the dumb ass speaking with man's voice forbad the madness of the prophet.

International Standard Version (2008)
But he was rebuked for his offense. A donkey that normally cannot talk spoke with a human voice and restrained the prophet's insanity.

Aramaic Bible in Plain English (2010)
But the reproof of his violation was a dumb donkey which spoke with the voice of men, restraining the madness of the Prophet.

GOD'S WORD Translation (1995)
But he was convicted for his evil. A donkey, which normally can't talk, spoke with a human voice and wouldn't allow the prophet to continue his insanity.

King James 2000 Bible (2003)
But was rebuked for his iniquity: the dumb donkey speaking with man's voice restrained the madness of the prophet.

American King James Version
But was rebuked for his iniquity: the dumb ass speaking with man's voice forbade the madness of the prophet.

American Standard Version
but he was rebuked for his own transgression: a dumb ass spake with man's voice and stayed the madness of the prophet.

Douay-Rheims Bible
But had a check of his madness, the dumb beast used to the yoke, which speaking with man's voice, forbade the folly of the prophet.

Darby Bible Translation
but had reproof of his own wickedness the dumb ass speaking with man's voice forbad the folly of the prophet.

English Revised Version
but he was rebuked for his own transgression: a dumb ass spake with man's voice and stayed the madness of the prophet.

Webster's Bible Translation
But was rebuked for his iniquity: the dumb ass speaking with man's voice, forbad the madness of the prophet.

Weymouth New Testament
But he was rebuked for his transgression: a dumb ass spoke with a human voice and checked the madness of the Prophet.

World English Bible
but he was rebuked for his own disobedience. A mute donkey spoke with a man's voice and stopped the madness of the prophet.

Frostwhite wrote:Pero di na dapat pang pahabain ito. Mangyaring pakihintay na lang ang pahayag ko ukol sa paksa dun sa isang thread. Medyo marami pong salita kaya kailangan ng oras. maraming salamat.

Frostwhite wrote:

Saang aklat ng gramatika mo nabasa na ang panghihiram ay pangongopya?

Ang lagay po e, hiniram nyo ba talaga?

Open naman po siguro sa lahat ang pagbabasa kung saan nyo kinuha yun. Pero ang lagay e pag nalaman nila kung saan kayo napapabilang na grupo e ipapahiram ba sa inyo? Malamang oo, pero malamang din hindi. Nagpaalam po ba kayo?


Oo nga at siguro ay may pareho kayong idea pero lahat e "nahiram" nyo e. Pati yung paratang na kesyo ganito daw na kesyo ganon.
Wala po ba kayong sariling stand ukol dito at kailangan nyo pa "manghiram"? So ibig sabihin "hiniram" nyo yung ideyang yun para lang sabihin na halos lahat ng relihiyon ay di payag na si Miguel at Jesus ay iisa? Kung may stand naman po sana tayo huwag na tayong "manghihram" ng stand ng iba para lang patunayan na tama kayo. Napaghahalata kayo e.

Kapatid, suporta lang yun. Kumbaga, suhay sa pagpapaliwanag namin ayon sa Biblia. "Eh, hindi niyo nga matanggap, kaya, kailangan kong ipakita sa inyo na kahit ang mga ibang grupo ng pananampalataya, may ganun ding pagpapaliwanag."

Kailan? Basahin nga natin ang talata:

Sige, hihintayin ko kapatid. May na-post na akong format. Usapan na lang ang kailangan.

Frostwhite wrote:

Kailan? Basahin nga natin ang talata:

Wala pong problema sa talata. Ang napansin ko po e yung "pinanganak" as in nanganak ng literal po ba? As in may matres o bahay bata?

Frostwhite wrote:

Sige, hihintayin ko kapatid. May na-post na akong format. Usapan na lang ang kailangan.

Sige po, pahintay nalang. Salamat.

Frostwhite wrote:Maganda po ang usapang yan Ginoo. Ok lang po ba na gagawa din ako ng paksa ukol diyan?

maghintay po tayo ng magiging moderator. hehe, at ng masimulan na ang, huwag po nating tawaging debate, talakayan na lang. pag debate po kasi parang hindi ko gusto.